Citizens Against the Landfill in Hempstead
For almost 4 years, Citizens Against the Landfill in Hempstead (CALH) has been fighting to prevent the Pintail Landfill proposed for a location on a 723 acre property called the Rainey Ranch, just north of 290 on Hwy 6, a mile north of Hempstead, Texas.
With the knowledge that this location was the worst possible site for a landfill, CALH has hired first-class experts in the legal and engineering fields to help stop Pintail in various courts of law. The City of Hempstead/CALH v Waller County/Pintail trial verdict in our favor in December 2014, along with the settlement agreement on February 20, 2015, were an important victory for CALH and its supporters. Still to be fought are the Appeal in the transfer station lawsuit against the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and the Contested Case Hearing before the State Office of Administrative Hearings, scheduled for August 2015.
Please browse our website for articles on these important legal matters, information and updates on events, past and future, and various news items from TV, radio and newspapers. We also have a section on donations and fundraising which lists many ways that you can help.
Our greatest resource and asset are the people of Waller County and other concerned citizens who have been willing to donate their time, knowledge and resources. We hope you will join CALH and work with us to stop this landfill development and return a bright future to our beautiful Waller County.
September's "More Than A Garage Sale"
You can DONATE to Stop Hwy 6 Landfill by clicking on the button below!
Recent CALH News
- ‘More than a’ Garage Sale, September 18 & 19
- Joint Motion For Sanctions Filed By City Of Hempstead And CALH
- The Times Tribune – Pintail Tries To Duck Application
- Pintail Admits That Their Landfill Application Does Not Meet TCEQ Regulations
- July 30, 2015 – Citizens Against The Landfill In Hempstead’s And City Of Hempstead’s Joint Motion For Summary Disposition
- July 30, 2015 – Citizens Against The Landfill In Hempstead’s And City Of Hempstead’s Joint Response To Pintail Landfill, LLC’s Motion For Continuance
- ‘More than a’ Garage Sale, August 14 &15
- Alarming Findings on Proposed Pintail Landfill Site
- Waller Times – Landfill Contest Not Finished
- Skirmishes About Landfill Finished
Pintail Admits That Their Landfill Application Does Not Meet TCEQ Regulations
On Wednesday, July 22, 2015, Pintail Landfill, LLC submitted a Motion for Continuance and Stay with the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH) Court in the Contested Case Hearing (CCH), seeking to delay the CCH indefinitely because their permit application does not meet TCEQ regulations.
The main reason given by Pintail for the admission that their application does not meet regulations is the recent discovery of the rise in the water table during a site visit by Citizens Against the Landfill in Hempstead (CALH) representatives on Friday, July 17. What they are essentially asking the Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) to do with this Motion is to allow Pintail to go back and totally redesign the landfill and virtually all other aspects of it.
The following is a quote from Pintail attorney, Brent Ryan, in his Motion for Continuance (Note: SHWL = Seasonal High Water Level):
“Because of this newly-discovered water level information, Pintail’s permit application, which was based on the SHWL established using the previously collected data from the site, no longer satisfies the requirements of TCEQ’s permitting rules. For example, after the SHWL is adjusted based on the new groundwater level data, the excavation for the waste disposal cells at the Pintail Landfill as currently designed will extend below the adjusted SHWL. Until it evaluates this new data and makes appropriate revisions to its permit application, Pintail cannot finalize and submit prefiled evidence that shows compliance with TCEQ’s permitting requirements. The changes that will need to be made to Pintail’s permit application potentially affect nearly every aspect of the application and the testimony and exhibits of nearly all of Pintail’s witnesses.” (emphasis added).
This large rise in the water table should not have been a surprise to Pintail. One of the major points made by CALH and others, time and time again, at TCEQ Public Meetings and in comments sent to the TCEQ during the public comment period, is that the highest readings that Pintail took of the water table during the worst of the 2010 to 2012 drought, were not representative of normal conditions at the location. Yet, Pintail had designed the bottom of the liner to within inches of the readings they had taken during the worst of the drought conditions. In periods of normal and above normal rainfall, when the water table would certainly rise, the landfill liner would be submerged below the water table.
Pintail chose to ignore all the warnings, stick their head in the sand, figuratively, and stop taking readings of the water table after the application was declared technically complete by the TCEQ in late 2012. That is until CALH forced the issue by requesting a second site visit to re-examine these critical water table elevations on July 17th.
On Thursday, July 30, 2015, CALH and the City of Hempstead filed a Formal Response to Pintail’s Motion for Continuance, as well as a Motion for Summary Disposition. In those filings, the attorneys for CALH and the City of Hempstead argue that the Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) overseeing this matter should dispose of this case with a Proposal for Decision, recommending denial of the permit application based on the grounds that there is no longer any dispute over whether the application meets regulatory requirements, since Pintail now acknowledges that it does not.
Under the Administrative Code, SOAH and the ALJs are charged with the duty of conducting full, fair, and efficient hearings, and their main purpose is determining whether an application complies with all applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. There is no longer any dispute of that.
It is unimaginable that, after four years of fighting this landfill, with CALH and the City of Hempstead collectively having spent more than one million dollars on the CCH alone to prove that the application does not comply with the regulations, the ALJs could grant Pintail’s motion for continuance in order to amend “nearly all aspects” of their application on an issue that Pintail had, or surely should have, anticipated. That would be neither fair nor efficient, and would be a travesty of justice to the citizens of this County and of the State.